Exposing the flaws in the greatest hoax inflicted on the human race.
Newsguard Review is Unscientific
Thos blog received a letter three days ago.
Hello,
I’m a reporter with NewsGuard who contacted you last year, and we are updating our review of AustralianClimateSceptics.com. I have a question about your site’s content for my review, if you would like to comment:
1. The May 2023 post “CO2 Rises; Temperatures Fall” stated that April 2023 was cooler than April 1998 according to UAH temperature data and said: “This is hard to explain under the global warming rubric that every molecule of CO2 causes a rise in average global temperature. Not only is there no demonstrable causation between emissions and temperatures, there is not even correlation.“
However, there’s a broad scientific consensus — reflected in findings from organizations including the IPCC, NOAA and NASA — that human emissions of carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gasses are the primary driver of global warming. The IPCC said in its 2021 report that GHG emissions have caused 1°C to 2°C of warming since the latter half of the 19th century, while human activity’s total contribution to global warming has been about 1.07°C (with aerosol emissions and other factors contributing minor cooling effects).
Also, the long-term warming trend in the UAH dataset is easily apparent, while the article ignored that and chose to compare April 2023 temperatures with the anomalously warm month of April 1998. Given all of this, do you believe that the article’s claim that there is no “demonstrable causation” or “correlation” between carbon dioxide levels and global temperatures is accurate? Why or why not?
As a reminder, we incorporate quotes from our correspondences into our published reviews, so this conversation should be considered on the record.
“I want to pause here and talk about this notion of consensus, and the rise of what has been called consensus science. I regard consensus science as an extremely pernicious development that ought to be stopped cold in its tracks. Historically, the claim of consensus has been the first refuge of scoundrels; it is a way to avoid debate by claiming that the matter is already settled. Whenever you hear the consensus of scientists agrees on something or other, reach for your wallet, because you’re being had. Let’s be clear: the work of science has nothing whatever to do with consensus.“
Mr Fishman refers to the IPCC’s 2021 report and links to the political document “Summary for Policy Makers.” This is a political summary approved “ line by line by governments.” (LINK)
As Donna Lafamboise points out in her Book: The Delinquent Teenager… Called a Summary for Policymakers, these documents are a few dozen pages in length. Now here’s the punch line: Scientists only draft these documents. The final wording is argued over, line-by-line, at those large IPCC meetings that drag on for days. You heard that right: the only IPCC documents likely to be read by outsiders aren’t scientific statements at all. Before the public is permitted to see them, Summary for Policymakers documents are subject to a process of political cleansing. (LINK hidden by the Google Goon Gang- republished HERE)
IPCC’s purpose exposed by our old blog hidden from the public by the Gang of Goons at Google (HERE)
The role of the IPCC is to assess on a comprehensive, objective, open and transparent basis the scientific, technical and socio-economic information relevant to understanding the scientific basis of risk of human-induced climate change, its potential impacts and options for adaptation and mitigation.
Unfortunately, after more than twenty years there has not been one shred of evidence produced to support the falsified hypothesis that human-caused carbon dioxide emissions are causing dangerous global warming. – known as man-made or anthropogenic global warming (AGW.)
From our old blog hidden by the Goon Google Gang (LINK)
As this blog was quoted in Mr. Fishman’s email:
“Not only is there no demonstrable causation between emissions and temperatures, there is not even correlation.”
The graph above shows that, over millions of years- there is no demonstrable causation between (CO2) emissions and temperatures, there is not even correlation.”
We know that
*water vapour (not CO2) is the main Greenhouse gas;
*CO2 is only a trace gas making up a minute 0.04% of the atmosphere;
* the Heating Effect of CO2 diminished dramatically for every 20ppm (see graph below)
From our old blog hidden from the public by the Goon Google Gang (LINK)
New calculations prove all human CO2 emitted since 1750 has added only 31 ppm (parts per million) of CO2 to the atmosphere, and natural CO2 has added 100 ppm.
All human carbon has added only one per cent to the carbon in Earth’s carbon cycle. Nature has added much more carbon to the carbon cycle than humans have added.
The new calculations use data from the United Nations Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). IPCC claims the CO2 level was 280 ppm in 1750, and human CO2 added the 131 ppm to get today’s 411 ppm. But IPCC’s calculations are in serious error.
So, Mr. Fishman:
If your aim is accuracy, you need to correct your review.
If, however, your aim, like the Goons from the Google Gang who have tried to shield the public from the truth that the #agwFraud is a Fraud on all humanity, keep up your shady endeavours.
